12. ICAIL 2009: Barcelona, Spain

Research papers

• Kevin D. Ashley:
  Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. 1-10
  
• Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Thomas F. Gordon:
  Isomorphism and argumentation. 11-20
  
• Raquel Mochales Palau, Aagje Ieven:
  Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR. 21-30
  
• Emile de Maat, Radboud Winkels:
  A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law. 31-39
  
• Pier-Luigi Spinosa, Gerardo Giardiello, Manola Cherubini, Simone Marchi, Giulia Venturi, Simonetta Montemagni:
  NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation. 40-49
  
• Alessandro Mazzei, Daniele P. Radicioni, Raffaella Brighi:
  NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics. 50-57
  
• Sindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken:
  Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. 58-67
  
• Alexander Artikis:
  Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systems. 68-77
  
• Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, Gerard Casamayor, Gabriela Ferraro, Simon Mille, Vanesa Vidal, Leo Wanner:
  Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claims. 78-87
  
• Eneldo Loza Mencía:
  Segmentation of legal documents. 88-97
  
• Raquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens:
  Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. 98-107
  
• Giovanni Sartor, Michel Rudnianski, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Eunate Mayor:
  Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exercise. 108-117
  
• Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sanjay Modgil:
  Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. 118-127
  
• Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang, Nguyen Duy Hung:
  Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief. 128-136
  
• Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton:
  Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. 137-146
  
• Tossapon Boongoen, Qiang Shen:
  Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detection. 147-156
  
• Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini:
  Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination. 157-166
  
• Jack G. Conrad, Jochen L. Leidner, Frank Schilder, Ravi Kondadadi:
  Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entries. 167-176
  
• John Zeleznikow, Brooke Abrahams:
  Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system. 177-184
  
• Rinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, Erik Hupkes:
  Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic web. 185-193
  
• Christopher Hogan, Robert Bauer, Dan Brassil:
  Human-aided computer cognition for e-discovery. 194-201
  
• Marc Lauritsen, Thomas F. Gordon:
  Toward a general theory of document modeling. 202-211
  

Research abstracts

• Floris Bex, Katie Atkinson:
  A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives. 212-213
  
• Vern R. Walker:
  Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfinding. 214-215
  
• Mary-Anne Williams:
  Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision. 216-217
  
• Cristian Prisacariu, Gerardo Schneider:
  Abstract specification of legal contracts. 218-219
  
• Tomasz Zurek, Emil Kruk:
  Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by law. 220-221
  
• Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven:
  Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. 222-223
  
• Stijn Colen, Fokie Cnossen, Bart Verheij:
  How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? 224-225
  
• Jan van Dijk, Sunil Choenni, Frans Leeuw:
  Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithm. 226-227
  
• Alzbeta Krausová, Fabio Massacci, Ayda Saïdane:
  How to capture and use legal patterns in IT. 228-229
  
• Ir. R. A. Hilhorst, Tom M. van Engers:
  e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned. 230-231
  
• Monica Palmirani, Luca Cervone, Fabio Vitali:
  Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalex. 232-233
  
• Michael J. Bommarito II, Daniel Katz, Jon Zelner:
  Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005). 234-235
  
• Pierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, Romain Boulet:
  The network of French legal codes. 236-237
  
• Raffaella Brighi, Monica Palmirani:
  Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approach. 238-239
  
• Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley:
  Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. 240-241